The Voluntary Carbon Market: New Report by BMO Equity Research
-
bookmark
-
print
In this special episode from BMO’s IN Tune Podcast, host Camilla Sutton is joined by Rachel Walsh to discuss The Voluntary Carbon Markets research report.
IN Tune features Equity Research analysts from BMO Capital Markets and explores key emerging themes, trends, and important issues to our institutional clients globally.
In this episode:
-
Why this market is currently in its “carpe diem” moment and has arrived at an important crossroad
-
While this market is slated for impressive growth, its potential is predicated on an ability to deliver high-integrity products
-
The certain nuanced aspects of the market, including differences with compliance and voluntary markets, credit-quality criteria, and the implication of Article 6 of the Paris Agreement
Sustainability Leaders podcast is live on all major channels including Apple, Google and Spotify
Subscribe to listen to other IN Tune episodes
Michael Torrance:
Welcome to Sustainability Leaders. I'm Michael Torrance, chief sustainability officer with BMO Financial Group. On this show, we will talk with leading sustainability practitioners from the corporate, investor, academic, and NGO communities to explore how this rapidly evolving field of sustainability is impacting global investment business practices and our world.
Disclosure:
The views expressed here are those of the participants and not those of Bank of Montreal, its affiliates, or subsidiaries.
Camilla Sutton:
The Voluntary Carbon markets are complex growing and receiving a lot of attention. On today's INTune podcast, we explore why they are important, what they are used for, how pricing works, and everything else that is critical for investors to understand. I am Camilla Sutton, MD and in Equity Research. And I'm joined by my colleague, Rachel Walsh, carbon innovation analyst speaking about her September report, which provides an in depth look at voluntary carbon markets. Rachel, I'm excited you're here. And I'm really curious where you're going to take us on today's conversation. Why don't we get started by setting the stage? Can you walk us through what the differences between voluntary and compliance carbon markets?
Rachel Walsh:
Thanks, Camilla. So, I think it's really important for listeners to understand that these are two very different markets that operate in parallel to one another, and that the credits between these markets are not interchangeable. First, on compliance markets, these markets are set up by government regulators to try and influence emissions reductions within their control. And participation in these markets is not optional. For these regulated entities who are typically very large stationary emitters - you can think of power generation facilities, chemical plants, refineries, just as some examples - I think it's also important to consider how credits are generated in the compliance market. They're created by emitters for outperforming whatever arbitrary cap or emissions intensity benchmark the regulator has set. And I think it's really important to note that there is no discernible difference between these credits as a result. You know, just to put that into context, a company might decide to dial back its operations during a time of economic hardship, which in turn could lower its emissions and allow that company to create compliance credits. Under this rules-based system, those credits would have the same economic value as a company that's actively investing in emissions mitigation technologies, assuming they were monetized at the same time. Now, this is a key differentiator between voluntary and the compliance markets. In addition to that compliance markets are quite exclusive. And participation is often restricted to regulated emitters and the financial intermediaries that help facilitate trades for them. And looking at the voluntary market. This market facilitates exactly what its title suggests it does, it's for the voluntary purchase of credits for those that wish to offset their emissions. That could include large corporations, foundations, governments or even individuals. You know, for corporations, specifically, the ability to voluntarily offset their emissions is becoming increasingly popular with the explosion in net zero targets. And credits in this market represent projects that have direct climate benefit, including those that reduce greenhouse gas emissions through mitigation activities are those that remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. And there is great pricing differentiation within this market based on the project type that these credits represent. In addition to that, there's no limit on participation in the voluntary market, unlike compliance markets. And then I think the only other major difference to note is the market size here, compliance markets have totaled roughly over $100 billion US and traded volume in 2021, while the voluntary market has reached just over a few billion dollars.
Camilla Sutton:
Rachel, I love the way you sum that up, you answered so many of my questions you touched briefly here on pricing. So can you walk us through and help us understand a little bit better about carbon pricing in the voluntary market?
Rachel Walsh:
Yeah, I think it's really important for listeners to understand the degree of pricing variance within the voluntary market. While a credit is meant to reflect the reduction or removal of one metric ton of carbon dioxide, each credit doesn't reflect an equivalent outcome. No, that disparity is largely driven from the quality of credit. So just as an example, take two removable credits. For instance, let's say one comes from planting of trees, and the other comes from direct air carbon capture, where carbon dioxide is removed from the atmosphere and then stored in a geologic formation. Now while the credit from both of these project types represents a single ton of carbon dioxide removed from the atmosphere, the tree may only live for 100 years, at which point the stored co2 is likely reverted back into the atmosphere. In the meantime, the co2 stored underground remains there. So how does the market handle that disparity in quality? Well, it does this through pricing with the longer duration credit trading at a premium. And I think the other key thing I would mention about pricing is that transparency in this market is generally lacking at the moment. Most credits, especially high-quality credits, trade through private over the counter transactions. And as a result, price discovery is generally challenged in the market as a whole at the moment, but we expect that to improve as the market matures.
Camilla Sutton:
So maybe shift course a little bit - Can you talk a bit about core carbon principles in the voluntary market?
Rachel Walsh:
The core carbon principles were coined by an integrity initiative group that aims to improve credibility in the market. And they are a set of attributes that help define the overall quality of a credit. And our report, we took an in depth look at these principles, including the concepts of additionality, permanence, robust quantification, verification, net negativity, and trade-offs. Now, in our minds, the more aligned a credit is with each of these principles, the greater it should be valued. And that is largely because these principles help a buyer determine whether or not a credit is creating a meaningful positive impact. And in our minds, a buyer is going to be more willing to pay up for credit that has clear benefit.
Camilla Sutton:
That's interesting. Can you walk us through a little bit what some of these concepts are like? Maybe start with additionality, permanence, and net negativity?
Rachel Walsh: Yeah, absolutely. First on additionality, this is the most critical aspect of a carbon credit, in our minds. And it's the determination of whether or not the creation of a monetizable credit is needed for a project to go ahead, or in other words, would the mitigation activity had been pursued without this carbon financing? Now, there are two ways to look at this first through a financial lens. And quite simply, that's just the determination of whether the sale of a credit was needed to push project economics over some investment hurdle rate. That rate is going to vary based on general project risk, jurisdictional risk, as well as, you know, a project developer’s access to capital. The other way to look at it would be from a regulatory lens. If an activity is legally required, then it would have happened regardless of the creation of voluntary carbon credits, and that would make it non additional. Now, in our view, any activity that is non additional should not be able to generate credits. It's really important for listeners to realize that additionality is not something that is static; Project economics can change over time, and so can regulations, the quality of a credit can change over time as a result, and that will largely be reflected in pricing. Now on permanence, this is really the quality of how long carbon is stored in some kind of medium, some of which is inherently risky. Think of biomass, for example, we kind of touched on this a bit earlier for reforestation project, a tree carbon is stored and may only live for 100 years. While there is a clear climate benefit to removing carbon from the atmosphere for that period of time. It's certainly not as beneficial as storing it underground for 1000s of years, we expect to credit from a project that stores carbon for a longer period of time to trade at a premium. And then on net negativity credits in this market represent a ton of emissions that are either avoided, reduced, or removed. Now to help listeners conceptualize this, we can think of emissions as being positive reductions as being neutral, and removals as being negative in terms of emissions flux with the atmosphere. If I am an emitter, and I am looking to truly offset my positive emissions, I would need to purchase something that represents negative emissions to do so, or in other words, removals. Now, the appropriateness of buying either reduction or removals credits will be dependent on what the offsetor is using them for specifically, you know, are they looking to use them to reach their emissions reduction targets? Okay, perhaps in that circumstance, only removals are appropriate? Or are they offsetting in excess of those targets than maybe reductions credits are appropriate? You know, in our opinion, negativity should be reflected in pricing. In other words, removals should trade at a significant premium to reduction credits. And that is something that we do see in the market today.
Camilla Sutton:
Those were great explanations. Thank you. One of the things that you highlight in your report is that there's over 170 types of carbon credits, Could you walk us through some of the most popular or maybe some of the ones that you find the most interesting?
Rachel Walsh:
Yeah, a lot of growth in the market lately has been from REDD plus projects, which stands for reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. We are also finding that household device projects are becoming increasingly popular, and these projects would provide fuel efficient cookstoves or water filtration devices to households in developing parts of the world. Not only do they lower fuel use in those communities, they also reduce emissions and they burn a lot cleaner than the open pit fires that these families would otherwise be using, which can lead to significant health benefits in those communities as well. I think the most intriguing project types go forward are ones that represent removals. For reasons we touched on previously. Some removal projects that are active today include reforestation, a forestation and egg roof forestry, which are essentially the planting of trees in different environments. Now, direct air carbon capture and sequestration is something that is currently transitioning from a pilot stage to commercial development for a few companies. And it's something that's really intriguing to watch these projects capture carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and inject it into geological formations for permanent storage. This represents the highest-quality project type that we looked at in our report, and development of these technologies have significant impacts on the market, in our minds. And then there's a lot of emerging removal technologies like enhanced mineralization, which essentially accelerates part of the carbon cycle and stores carbon permanently in mineral form, which while that's early days, we think that's really intriguing to watch.
Camilla Sutton:
You've talked a little bit about quality. Can I just push you on that a bit? Can you talk a bit more about how much quality of the offsets matter?
Rachel Walsh:
Yes, so quality is the most critical aspect of the market, in our minds. Ultimately, success for this market and its future growth are going to be dependent on its ability to deliver high integrity products. You know, going back to our discussion on core carbon principles, these attributes indicate that a credit represents a meaningful emissions outcome. If these credits don't represent that offsetting is not going to lead to neutralization of those related emissions, and total emissions will continue to rise as a result. Now that opens buyers in the market up to reputational risk, and that could deter them from accessing the market all together, in our minds.
Camilla Sutton:
Within Equity Research, BMO covers 930 companies, and one of the things that you've done is look at all of these with regards to corporate offsetting. Tell us a bit about what you learned.
Rachel Walsh:
I think the biggest takeaway was just how much inconsistency there was on offsetting disclosures across our coverage universe, some companies merely mentioned that they were using offsets, you know, some directly referenced using high-quality offsets, but then didn't speak to what that meant to them, exactly. And then interestingly, there were even a few companies that disclosed outright that they were using offsets that we would identify as being low quality. I think that speaks to just general lack of sophistication in offsetting, and also a lack of official guidelines in the space at the moment. Those things are currently being developed. We touched on a few of them in the report, which you know, kind of serve as a method of best practice. I think, as those things continue to be rolled out, and certain requirements come into play, advisory services are going to emerge, disclosure around the role of offsetting what volume is being purchased, and the level of quality that is being used are going to quickly improve.
Camilla Sutton:
Looking out into the future: What do you think is the most interesting area or the most interesting areas to watch when it comes to voluntary carbon markets?
Rachel Walsh:
I think for me, it's the implications that Article 6 is going to have on the market. You know, just quickly on Article 6, it's a provision in the Paris Agreement that sets guardrails for what are considered internationally transferred mitigation outcomes to help countries reach their reduction commitments, just as some industries can't decarbonize at the same cost countries run into the same problem. And this provision allows them to trade emissions outcomes. One really critical component of Article 6 is something called corresponding adjustment, which is an accounting measure that makes sure that double counting has not taken place. Imagine a credit is being generated in one country and is sold to a buyer and another corresponding adjustment would be required, where the country that is producing the credit would have to raise their emissions inventory, because the country that is purchasing the credit is now reducing their emissions inventory. So how does this impact the voluntary market? Well, it gives the exporting nation the authority to interrupt international trade of voluntary credits, essentially, those governments have to authorize export of those credits. Now, if you're a country with your own climate commitments, you wouldn't want to be exporting your credits in excess or it'd be difficult to reach those commitments. And you're already seeing the impacts of this India recently restricted export of voluntary credits until they're able to reach their own commitments under the Paris agreement. And Indonesia has also interfered with certain aspects of the market while it considers its own compliance market. So there's been a few other examples of this as well, but it's certainly already hitting news. Now, there are ways to mitigate risk of Article 6 for voluntary market players, and that could include trading credits domestically to avoid any implications from this. Now that would provide that emitters and these project developers are in the same jurisdiction. Either way, this adds a layer of complexity to this already complex market and investors need to be aware of it.
Camilla Sutton:
Rachel, I really appreciate you joining us today and sharing all of that knowledge. That was Rachel Walsh BMO carbon innovation analyst. BMO Capital Markets is proud to deliver a thoughtful analysis of upcoming Equity Research trends that will prove important to clients investment decisions for both its INTune podcast as well as our commodity specific metal matters hosted by Colin Hamilton. If you enjoyed today's INTune podcast, please do subscribe and rate it.
Michael Torrance:
Thanks for listening to Sustainability Leaders. This podcast is presented by BMO Financial Group. To access all the resources we discussed in today's episode and to see our other podcasts, visit us at bmo.com/sustainabilityleaders. You can listen and subscribe free to our show on Apple Podcasts or your favorite podcast provider and will greatly appreciate a rating and review and any feedback that you might have. Our show and resources are produced with support from BMO's marketing team and Puddle Creative. Until next time, I'm Michael Torrance. Have a great week.
Disclosure:
The views expressed here are those of the participants and not those at Bank of Montreal, its affiliates, or subsidiaries. This is not intended to serve as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any company, industry, strategy, or security. This presentation may contain forward-looking statements. Investors are caution not to place undue reliance on such statements as actual results could vary. This presentation is for general information purposes only and does not constitute investment, legal, or tax advice, and is not intended as an endorsement of any specific investment, product, or service. Individual investors should consult with an investment tax and/or legal professional about their personal situation. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
- Minute Read
- Listen Stop
- Text Bigger | Text Smaller
In this special episode from BMO’s IN Tune Podcast, host Camilla Sutton is joined by Rachel Walsh to discuss The Voluntary Carbon Markets research report.
IN Tune features Equity Research analysts from BMO Capital Markets and explores key emerging themes, trends, and important issues to our institutional clients globally.
In this episode:
-
Why this market is currently in its “carpe diem” moment and has arrived at an important crossroad
-
While this market is slated for impressive growth, its potential is predicated on an ability to deliver high-integrity products
-
The certain nuanced aspects of the market, including differences with compliance and voluntary markets, credit-quality criteria, and the implication of Article 6 of the Paris Agreement
Sustainability Leaders podcast is live on all major channels including Apple, Google and Spotify
Subscribe to listen to other IN Tune episodes
Michael Torrance:
Welcome to Sustainability Leaders. I'm Michael Torrance, chief sustainability officer with BMO Financial Group. On this show, we will talk with leading sustainability practitioners from the corporate, investor, academic, and NGO communities to explore how this rapidly evolving field of sustainability is impacting global investment business practices and our world.
Disclosure:
The views expressed here are those of the participants and not those of Bank of Montreal, its affiliates, or subsidiaries.
Camilla Sutton:
The Voluntary Carbon markets are complex growing and receiving a lot of attention. On today's INTune podcast, we explore why they are important, what they are used for, how pricing works, and everything else that is critical for investors to understand. I am Camilla Sutton, MD and in Equity Research. And I'm joined by my colleague, Rachel Walsh, carbon innovation analyst speaking about her September report, which provides an in depth look at voluntary carbon markets. Rachel, I'm excited you're here. And I'm really curious where you're going to take us on today's conversation. Why don't we get started by setting the stage? Can you walk us through what the differences between voluntary and compliance carbon markets?
Rachel Walsh:
Thanks, Camilla. So, I think it's really important for listeners to understand that these are two very different markets that operate in parallel to one another, and that the credits between these markets are not interchangeable. First, on compliance markets, these markets are set up by government regulators to try and influence emissions reductions within their control. And participation in these markets is not optional. For these regulated entities who are typically very large stationary emitters - you can think of power generation facilities, chemical plants, refineries, just as some examples - I think it's also important to consider how credits are generated in the compliance market. They're created by emitters for outperforming whatever arbitrary cap or emissions intensity benchmark the regulator has set. And I think it's really important to note that there is no discernible difference between these credits as a result. You know, just to put that into context, a company might decide to dial back its operations during a time of economic hardship, which in turn could lower its emissions and allow that company to create compliance credits. Under this rules-based system, those credits would have the same economic value as a company that's actively investing in emissions mitigation technologies, assuming they were monetized at the same time. Now, this is a key differentiator between voluntary and the compliance markets. In addition to that compliance markets are quite exclusive. And participation is often restricted to regulated emitters and the financial intermediaries that help facilitate trades for them. And looking at the voluntary market. This market facilitates exactly what its title suggests it does, it's for the voluntary purchase of credits for those that wish to offset their emissions. That could include large corporations, foundations, governments or even individuals. You know, for corporations, specifically, the ability to voluntarily offset their emissions is becoming increasingly popular with the explosion in net zero targets. And credits in this market represent projects that have direct climate benefit, including those that reduce greenhouse gas emissions through mitigation activities are those that remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. And there is great pricing differentiation within this market based on the project type that these credits represent. In addition to that, there's no limit on participation in the voluntary market, unlike compliance markets. And then I think the only other major difference to note is the market size here, compliance markets have totaled roughly over $100 billion US and traded volume in 2021, while the voluntary market has reached just over a few billion dollars.
Camilla Sutton:
Rachel, I love the way you sum that up, you answered so many of my questions you touched briefly here on pricing. So can you walk us through and help us understand a little bit better about carbon pricing in the voluntary market?
Rachel Walsh:
Yeah, I think it's really important for listeners to understand the degree of pricing variance within the voluntary market. While a credit is meant to reflect the reduction or removal of one metric ton of carbon dioxide, each credit doesn't reflect an equivalent outcome. No, that disparity is largely driven from the quality of credit. So just as an example, take two removable credits. For instance, let's say one comes from planting of trees, and the other comes from direct air carbon capture, where carbon dioxide is removed from the atmosphere and then stored in a geologic formation. Now while the credit from both of these project types represents a single ton of carbon dioxide removed from the atmosphere, the tree may only live for 100 years, at which point the stored co2 is likely reverted back into the atmosphere. In the meantime, the co2 stored underground remains there. So how does the market handle that disparity in quality? Well, it does this through pricing with the longer duration credit trading at a premium. And I think the other key thing I would mention about pricing is that transparency in this market is generally lacking at the moment. Most credits, especially high-quality credits, trade through private over the counter transactions. And as a result, price discovery is generally challenged in the market as a whole at the moment, but we expect that to improve as the market matures.
Camilla Sutton:
So maybe shift course a little bit - Can you talk a bit about core carbon principles in the voluntary market?
Rachel Walsh:
The core carbon principles were coined by an integrity initiative group that aims to improve credibility in the market. And they are a set of attributes that help define the overall quality of a credit. And our report, we took an in depth look at these principles, including the concepts of additionality, permanence, robust quantification, verification, net negativity, and trade-offs. Now, in our minds, the more aligned a credit is with each of these principles, the greater it should be valued. And that is largely because these principles help a buyer determine whether or not a credit is creating a meaningful positive impact. And in our minds, a buyer is going to be more willing to pay up for credit that has clear benefit.
Camilla Sutton:
That's interesting. Can you walk us through a little bit what some of these concepts are like? Maybe start with additionality, permanence, and net negativity?
Rachel Walsh: Yeah, absolutely. First on additionality, this is the most critical aspect of a carbon credit, in our minds. And it's the determination of whether or not the creation of a monetizable credit is needed for a project to go ahead, or in other words, would the mitigation activity had been pursued without this carbon financing? Now, there are two ways to look at this first through a financial lens. And quite simply, that's just the determination of whether the sale of a credit was needed to push project economics over some investment hurdle rate. That rate is going to vary based on general project risk, jurisdictional risk, as well as, you know, a project developer’s access to capital. The other way to look at it would be from a regulatory lens. If an activity is legally required, then it would have happened regardless of the creation of voluntary carbon credits, and that would make it non additional. Now, in our view, any activity that is non additional should not be able to generate credits. It's really important for listeners to realize that additionality is not something that is static; Project economics can change over time, and so can regulations, the quality of a credit can change over time as a result, and that will largely be reflected in pricing. Now on permanence, this is really the quality of how long carbon is stored in some kind of medium, some of which is inherently risky. Think of biomass, for example, we kind of touched on this a bit earlier for reforestation project, a tree carbon is stored and may only live for 100 years. While there is a clear climate benefit to removing carbon from the atmosphere for that period of time. It's certainly not as beneficial as storing it underground for 1000s of years, we expect to credit from a project that stores carbon for a longer period of time to trade at a premium. And then on net negativity credits in this market represent a ton of emissions that are either avoided, reduced, or removed. Now to help listeners conceptualize this, we can think of emissions as being positive reductions as being neutral, and removals as being negative in terms of emissions flux with the atmosphere. If I am an emitter, and I am looking to truly offset my positive emissions, I would need to purchase something that represents negative emissions to do so, or in other words, removals. Now, the appropriateness of buying either reduction or removals credits will be dependent on what the offsetor is using them for specifically, you know, are they looking to use them to reach their emissions reduction targets? Okay, perhaps in that circumstance, only removals are appropriate? Or are they offsetting in excess of those targets than maybe reductions credits are appropriate? You know, in our opinion, negativity should be reflected in pricing. In other words, removals should trade at a significant premium to reduction credits. And that is something that we do see in the market today.
Camilla Sutton:
Those were great explanations. Thank you. One of the things that you highlight in your report is that there's over 170 types of carbon credits, Could you walk us through some of the most popular or maybe some of the ones that you find the most interesting?
Rachel Walsh:
Yeah, a lot of growth in the market lately has been from REDD plus projects, which stands for reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. We are also finding that household device projects are becoming increasingly popular, and these projects would provide fuel efficient cookstoves or water filtration devices to households in developing parts of the world. Not only do they lower fuel use in those communities, they also reduce emissions and they burn a lot cleaner than the open pit fires that these families would otherwise be using, which can lead to significant health benefits in those communities as well. I think the most intriguing project types go forward are ones that represent removals. For reasons we touched on previously. Some removal projects that are active today include reforestation, a forestation and egg roof forestry, which are essentially the planting of trees in different environments. Now, direct air carbon capture and sequestration is something that is currently transitioning from a pilot stage to commercial development for a few companies. And it's something that's really intriguing to watch these projects capture carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and inject it into geological formations for permanent storage. This represents the highest-quality project type that we looked at in our report, and development of these technologies have significant impacts on the market, in our minds. And then there's a lot of emerging removal technologies like enhanced mineralization, which essentially accelerates part of the carbon cycle and stores carbon permanently in mineral form, which while that's early days, we think that's really intriguing to watch.
Camilla Sutton:
You've talked a little bit about quality. Can I just push you on that a bit? Can you talk a bit more about how much quality of the offsets matter?
Rachel Walsh:
Yes, so quality is the most critical aspect of the market, in our minds. Ultimately, success for this market and its future growth are going to be dependent on its ability to deliver high integrity products. You know, going back to our discussion on core carbon principles, these attributes indicate that a credit represents a meaningful emissions outcome. If these credits don't represent that offsetting is not going to lead to neutralization of those related emissions, and total emissions will continue to rise as a result. Now that opens buyers in the market up to reputational risk, and that could deter them from accessing the market all together, in our minds.
Camilla Sutton:
Within Equity Research, BMO covers 930 companies, and one of the things that you've done is look at all of these with regards to corporate offsetting. Tell us a bit about what you learned.
Rachel Walsh:
I think the biggest takeaway was just how much inconsistency there was on offsetting disclosures across our coverage universe, some companies merely mentioned that they were using offsets, you know, some directly referenced using high-quality offsets, but then didn't speak to what that meant to them, exactly. And then interestingly, there were even a few companies that disclosed outright that they were using offsets that we would identify as being low quality. I think that speaks to just general lack of sophistication in offsetting, and also a lack of official guidelines in the space at the moment. Those things are currently being developed. We touched on a few of them in the report, which you know, kind of serve as a method of best practice. I think, as those things continue to be rolled out, and certain requirements come into play, advisory services are going to emerge, disclosure around the role of offsetting what volume is being purchased, and the level of quality that is being used are going to quickly improve.
Camilla Sutton:
Looking out into the future: What do you think is the most interesting area or the most interesting areas to watch when it comes to voluntary carbon markets?
Rachel Walsh:
I think for me, it's the implications that Article 6 is going to have on the market. You know, just quickly on Article 6, it's a provision in the Paris Agreement that sets guardrails for what are considered internationally transferred mitigation outcomes to help countries reach their reduction commitments, just as some industries can't decarbonize at the same cost countries run into the same problem. And this provision allows them to trade emissions outcomes. One really critical component of Article 6 is something called corresponding adjustment, which is an accounting measure that makes sure that double counting has not taken place. Imagine a credit is being generated in one country and is sold to a buyer and another corresponding adjustment would be required, where the country that is producing the credit would have to raise their emissions inventory, because the country that is purchasing the credit is now reducing their emissions inventory. So how does this impact the voluntary market? Well, it gives the exporting nation the authority to interrupt international trade of voluntary credits, essentially, those governments have to authorize export of those credits. Now, if you're a country with your own climate commitments, you wouldn't want to be exporting your credits in excess or it'd be difficult to reach those commitments. And you're already seeing the impacts of this India recently restricted export of voluntary credits until they're able to reach their own commitments under the Paris agreement. And Indonesia has also interfered with certain aspects of the market while it considers its own compliance market. So there's been a few other examples of this as well, but it's certainly already hitting news. Now, there are ways to mitigate risk of Article 6 for voluntary market players, and that could include trading credits domestically to avoid any implications from this. Now that would provide that emitters and these project developers are in the same jurisdiction. Either way, this adds a layer of complexity to this already complex market and investors need to be aware of it.
Camilla Sutton:
Rachel, I really appreciate you joining us today and sharing all of that knowledge. That was Rachel Walsh BMO carbon innovation analyst. BMO Capital Markets is proud to deliver a thoughtful analysis of upcoming Equity Research trends that will prove important to clients investment decisions for both its INTune podcast as well as our commodity specific metal matters hosted by Colin Hamilton. If you enjoyed today's INTune podcast, please do subscribe and rate it.
Michael Torrance:
Thanks for listening to Sustainability Leaders. This podcast is presented by BMO Financial Group. To access all the resources we discussed in today's episode and to see our other podcasts, visit us at bmo.com/sustainabilityleaders. You can listen and subscribe free to our show on Apple Podcasts or your favorite podcast provider and will greatly appreciate a rating and review and any feedback that you might have. Our show and resources are produced with support from BMO's marketing team and Puddle Creative. Until next time, I'm Michael Torrance. Have a great week.
Disclosure:
The views expressed here are those of the participants and not those at Bank of Montreal, its affiliates, or subsidiaries. This is not intended to serve as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any company, industry, strategy, or security. This presentation may contain forward-looking statements. Investors are caution not to place undue reliance on such statements as actual results could vary. This presentation is for general information purposes only and does not constitute investment, legal, or tax advice, and is not intended as an endorsement of any specific investment, product, or service. Individual investors should consult with an investment tax and/or legal professional about their personal situation. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
You might also be interested in
Why Sustainability Is Good Business: Key Takeaways from IEFA Toronto 2024
Building for Tomorrow: Real Estate, Construction, and Sustainability
Women Entrepreneurs are Advancing Sustainability: Reflecting on the Results of the WE Empower UN SDG Challenge
Canadian Zero-Carbon Multi-Unit Residential Buildings: An Analysis of the Cost and Asset Value
BMO Equity Research on the AI + Data Center Build Out: Sustainability Impacts, Second Order Beneficiaries
A First in Western Canada: Avenue Living Leverages BMO's Retrofit Program to Add 179 New Rental Units in Downtown Edmonton
Making Renewable Energy Technology Accessible to Underserved Communities: GRID Alternatives in Conversation
Women are Leading Across the Landscape of Climate and Sustainability
The Role of Responsible Mining in the Clean Energy Transition: ICMM CEO Rohitesh Dhawan in Conversation
How NASA and IBM Are Using Geospatial Data and AI to Analyze Climate Risks
BMO Arranges Green Financing to Fund New Lawson Centre for Sustainability, Trinity College's Most Significant Build in a Century
BMO ranked one of the most sustainable companies in North America on the Dow Jones Sustainability Indices
Canada Has an Opportunity to Become a Global Leader in Carbon Dioxide Removal
Extreme Temperatures: How North American Cities Amplify Climate Change
More Companies Have Plans to Address Climate Change Based on Rising Business Importance: Survey Results
BMO Climate Institute Business Leaders Survey: Nearly Half of Business Leaders in the U.S. and Canada Believe Climate Change Has Already Affected Their Businesses, but Few Have a Strategy
Transforming the Textile Industry: Apparel Impact Institute in Conversation
How the Energy Sector Is Helping Canada Achieve Its Decarbonization Goals
Protecting Outdoor Spaces: The Conservation Alliance in Conversation
Building Meaningful Connections with Nature: Parks California in Conversation
Transforming the Global Food System to Benefit Investors and the Planet
Why Businesses Need to Accelerate Their Efforts to Fight Climate Change
BMO Donates $3 Million to GRID Alternatives to Provide Solar Energy Solutions for Low-Income Families
Banco do Brasil and BMO Financial Group to Introduce First-of-its-Kind Program to Provide Sustainability-Linked Trade Loans Supporting Brazilian Exporters
Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC): Mark Podlasly in Conversation
BMO Provides Innovative New Sustainability-Linked Deposit Product to Zurn Elkay Water Solutions
Quick Listen: Michael Torrance on Empowering Your Organization to Operationalize Sustainability
Quick Listen: Darryl White on the Importance of US-Canada Partnership
BMO and Bell Canada Execute Innovative Sustainability-Linked Derivative Tied to Ambitious GHG Emission Reduction Targets
BMO Named to UN-Convened Group Providing Guidance to Global Banks on Nature Target Setting
Driving Innovations In Tech To Strengthen Climate Resilience With Climate Engine’s Spatiafi, Built On Google Cloud
BMO Celebrates Earth Day with 3rd Annual Trees from Trades Day on its Global Trading Floors
BMO Donates $2 Million to the University of Saskatchewan to Accelerate Research Critical to the Future of Food
North America’s Critical Minerals Advantage: Deep Dive on Community Engagement
Exploring North America’s Critical Minerals Advantage: Global Metals, Mining & Critical Minerals Conference
Rock Legends Reflect on Mining Hits and Misses: Global Metals, Mining & Critical Minerals Conference
The Most Valuable Commodity is Trust: ICMM to BMO Global Metals, Mining & Critical Minerals Conference
BMO Experts at our 32nd Global Metals, Mining & Critical Minerals Conference
Evolving Mining for a Sustainable Energy Transition: ICMM CEO Rohitesh Dhawan in Conversation
Public Policy and the Energy Transition: Howard Learner in Conversation
Quick Listen: Darryl White on the Economic Implications of a Rapidly-Aging Society
Taskforce on Nature-Related Financial Disclosure (TNFD) – A Plan for Integrating Nature into Business
Takeaways from the BMO Climate Institute Small and Mid-Sized Businesses Climate Survey
BMO Ranked North America's Most Sustainable Bank by Corporate Knights for Fourth Consecutive Year
Is Green Financing for Nuclear the Next Frontier in the Energy Transition?
ESG Trends in the Base Metal and Diversified Mining Industries: BMO Equity Research Report
BMO ranked one of the most sustainable companies in North America on the Dow Jones Sustainability Indices
BMO Climate Institute Survey Shows Costs and Competing Priorities Slowing Climate Action for Small and Mid-Sized Businesses
Managing and Monetizing Your Transition to a Net Zero World with BMO and Radicle
BMO the Top Ranked Financial Institution on New Global Sustainability Benchmark Announced at COP 27
COP27 in Focus: Will Energy Security and Economic Uncertainty Impact the Climate Transition?
BMO to Invest in Innovative Carbon Offsets from CarbonCure to Permanently Store CO2
RoadMap Project: An Indigenous-led Paradigm Shift for Economic Reconciliation
A Canadian First: BMO and Concordia University Partner for a Sustainable Future with Innovative Sustainability-Linked Loan
On-Farm Carbon and Emissions Management: Opportunities and Challenges
Sustainability Strategy and Reporting for Small and Medium Sized Companies: A Discussion at the Conference of Montreal
BMO to Acquire Calgary-based Radicle Group Inc., a Leader in Environmental Services
Investment Opportunities for a Net-Zero Economy: A Conversation at the Milken Institute Global Conference
How Hope, Grit, and a Hospital Network Saved Maverix Private Capital Founder John Ruffolo
Hydrogen’s Role in the Energy Transition: Matt Fairley in Conversation
Exploring the Physical and Transition Risks Facing Food and Agriculture
Key Takeaways on Ag, Food, Fertilizer & ESG from BMO’s Farm to Market Conference
Building an ESG Business Case in the Food Sector: The Food Institute
Forging Ahead in the Energy Transition: Darryl White to Global Reserve and Asset Managers
BMO and EDC Announce Collaboration to Introduce Sustainable Finance Solutions for Canadian Businesses
Retrofitting Canada's Building Sector: Efficiency Canada’s Corey Diamond in Conversation
The Role of Hydrogen in the Energy Transition: FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few in Conversation
BMO proud to support first Government of Canada Green Bond transaction as joint-lead manager
Op Ed: Government Action Can Help Spur More Home Building To Address Canada’s Housing Shortage
Tackling Climate Change in Metals and Mining: ICMM CEO Rohitesh Dhawan in Conversation
BMO Launches Business Within Reach: BMO for Black Entrepreneurs and Commits $100 million in loans to Help Black-led Businesses Start up, Scale up, and Grow
The Post 2020 Biodiversity Framework – A Discussion with Basile Van Havre
BMO Announces Plan to Partner with Breakthrough Energy Catalyst to Accelerate Climate Innovation
BMO Financial Group Named North America's Most Sustainable Bank for Third Consecutive Year
Mitigating the Physical Impacts of Climate Change with Spatial Finance
Part 2: Talking Energy Transition, Climate Risk & More with Bloomberg’s Patricia Torres
Part 1: Talking Energy Transition, Climate Risk & More with Bloomberg’s Patricia Torres
BMO Helps Boralex Go Beyond Renewable Energy, with the Transition of its Credit Facility to a Sustainability-Linked Loan
A Global First: BMO Supports Bruce Power with World's First Nuclear Green Financing Framework
BMO ranked one of the most sustainable companies in the world according to Dow Jones Sustainability Indices
The Risk of Permafrost Thaw on People, Infrastructure & Our Future Climate
The Future of Remote Work and Diversity in the Asset Management Industry
North American Metals & Mining first: BMO helps Sandstorm Gold Royalties achieve ESG goals with Sustainability-Linked Loan
Education, Employment and Economic Empowerment: BMO Releases Wîcihitowin ᐑᒋᐦᐃᑐᐏᐣ- First Annual Indigenous Partnerships and Progress Report
BMO Announces $12 Billion Financing Commitment towards Affordable Housing in Canada
BMO supports Canada's bid to host the headquarters of the International Sustainability Standards Board
In support of Canada’s bid to host the headquarters of the International Sustainability Standards Board
BMO Named to Canada's Best 50 Corporate Citizens Ranking by Corporate Knights
Biggest Trends in Food and Ag, From ESG to Inflation to the Supply Chain
A North American First: BMO Helps Gibson Energy Fully Transition Credit Facility to a Sustainability-Linked Loan
Understanding Biodiversity Management: Best Practices and Innovation
Episode 31: Valuing Natural Capital – A Discussion with Pavan Sukhdev
Episode 29: What 20 Years of ESG Engagement Can Teach Us About the Future
BMO Financial Group 2020 Sustainability Report and Public Accountability Statement Now Available Online
Episode 28: Bloomberg: Enhancing ESG Disclosure through Data-Driven Solutions
BMO Ranked Among Most Sustainable Companies on Dow Jones Sustainability Index - North America
BMO investing in a sustainable future with $1M donation to the Institute for Sustainable Finance
BMO Financial Group Reaches Key Milestone in Matching 100 Per Cent of Electricity Usage with Renewables
BMO Financial Group Recognized as One of the World's Most Sustainably Managed Companies in New Wall Street Journal Ranking
Episode 23: TC Transcontinental – A Market Leader in Sustainable Packaging
BMO Financial Group to Source 100 Per Cent of Electricity Usage From Renewables
Episode 07: World Bank: Mobilizing Capital Markets for Sustainable Finance
Episode 06: Responsible Investing – Industry Trends and Best Practices from Canada